Latest
- From the bottom of Hitchens' cold, curmudgeonly he...
- Third World Democracy Board Game
- Best DON'T from Vice Magazine
- Dan and Giselle Go to Latin America
- A Political Rantlet for Saturday Morning
- Ponce De Leon @ Mercury Lounge
- The Black Eyed Peas are the biggest douchebags on ...
- My Work Christmas Party Actually Rocked
- Five Tens from Lastnightsparty.com
- I got in an argument with a cab driver tonight.
Best of
Archives
- July 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- November 2011
- July 2012
- October 2012
Blanketing opinions that I'll probably regret soon.
Tuesday, December 27, 2005
I've gone from agnostic to atheist. Finally.
What convinced me in the end? Listening to the mash-up between AC/DC's "Shook Me All Night Long" and the Black Eyed Peas' song, "Humps", of course.
No, just kidding. Seriously, I've made the leap from agnostic to atheist. You always hear about people who are agnostic, but you never hear when they make the switch-over to 100% non-believer. You can now say that about me.
What did it? What pushed me over the edge from near-godless heathen to full-on heathen? The Science Channel.
People, people. We're all fuckin' star dust. It's so logical it's just amazing that it took me 32 years to finally realize it: everything is explainable, logical and measurable. If it can't be measured now, it will be some day. Believe it. There's no such thing as faith---it's all on chance. An agnostic is someone who's afraid to say there are just stars, and zero else.
But I don't have the time or the space to elaborate here. Hopefully you'll be able to catch the Science Channel's earth science programs so you, too, can be a heathen like me.
No, just kidding. Seriously, I've made the leap from agnostic to atheist. You always hear about people who are agnostic, but you never hear when they make the switch-over to 100% non-believer. You can now say that about me.
What did it? What pushed me over the edge from near-godless heathen to full-on heathen? The Science Channel.
People, people. We're all fuckin' star dust. It's so logical it's just amazing that it took me 32 years to finally realize it: everything is explainable, logical and measurable. If it can't be measured now, it will be some day. Believe it. There's no such thing as faith---it's all on chance. An agnostic is someone who's afraid to say there are just stars, and zero else.
But I don't have the time or the space to elaborate here. Hopefully you'll be able to catch the Science Channel's earth science programs so you, too, can be a heathen like me.
Comments:
<< Home
Welcome to the club. Apparently the above "anonymous" commenter isn't happy with your recent enlightenment.
But how did the star dust get there? I'm agnostic because I just don't give a fuck about that brand of navel-gazing :-)
Alias,
Athiests: Science cannot yet explain why the star dust exists. But not knowing this is not evidence that a supernatural being created it. That would defy Occam's Razor and the scientific method in general.
Agnostics: Science cannot yet explain why the star dust exists so this *might mean* that a supernatural being created it.
Athiests: Science cannot yet explain why the star dust exists. But not knowing this is not evidence that a supernatural being created it. That would defy Occam's Razor and the scientific method in general.
Agnostics: Science cannot yet explain why the star dust exists so this *might mean* that a supernatural being created it.
RL,
Whether you're a godless secular humanist or otherwise, the Judeo-Christian tradition has formed western civilization's concept of morality for over a thousand years. However, this fact proves nothing about the existence or gods, fairies or wookies for that matter.
Whether you're a godless secular humanist or otherwise, the Judeo-Christian tradition has formed western civilization's concept of morality for over a thousand years. However, this fact proves nothing about the existence or gods, fairies or wookies for that matter.
RL,
My "source of morality" or ideas of right vs. wrong derive from the culture I grew up in, not the idea that there's a supernatural creator standing on a cloud somewhere. Our culture's concepts of right and wrong are directly influenced by the Judeo-Christian tradition, and again, that fact 1) does not prove the existence of god and 2) does not mean that an athiest has no source of morality.
As for the drink, I forgot your lady wanted to watch the Apprentice. No problem. I understand.
My "source of morality" or ideas of right vs. wrong derive from the culture I grew up in, not the idea that there's a supernatural creator standing on a cloud somewhere. Our culture's concepts of right and wrong are directly influenced by the Judeo-Christian tradition, and again, that fact 1) does not prove the existence of god and 2) does not mean that an athiest has no source of morality.
As for the drink, I forgot your lady wanted to watch the Apprentice. No problem. I understand.
Hi Lonnie,
Welcome to the club. Unfortunately, "theist", "agnostic", and "atheist" are not all points along the same line.
You see, the words "theist" and "atheist" describe the presence or absence of god-belief in a human being. That's all. nothing more, nothing less. They are words that deal with god belief.
"gnostic" and "agnostic" are words that deal with knowledge. Specifically, whether or not a god or gods can be known. A "gnostic" thinks that a god or gods can indeed be known, and an "agnostic" does not think that a god or gods can be known.
So, because the words do not represent points all along the same line, and because they deal with different areas (IE, god-belief and god-knowledge) it is entirely possible to be an "agnostic atheist", or an "agnostic theist".
So, when you say you've gone from "agnostic to atheist", what youy're really saying is that you've gone from "theist to atheist", from a god-believer to a non-believer.
No big deal, really, but it is always surprising to me how many people think that "agnostic" is some sort of fence-sitiing middle-ground. It's not.
In any case, congratulations on your new reality-based outlook on life. You'll find that many folks now will judge you exclusively by your lack of belief, and that your atheism will be discriminated against and equated with evil and immorality.
But you will have your self respect, and you won't have to lie to yourself anymore that some magic man in the sky made it all with magic. That's important.
Hang in there, and Happy New Year!
Welcome to the club. Unfortunately, "theist", "agnostic", and "atheist" are not all points along the same line.
You see, the words "theist" and "atheist" describe the presence or absence of god-belief in a human being. That's all. nothing more, nothing less. They are words that deal with god belief.
"gnostic" and "agnostic" are words that deal with knowledge. Specifically, whether or not a god or gods can be known. A "gnostic" thinks that a god or gods can indeed be known, and an "agnostic" does not think that a god or gods can be known.
So, because the words do not represent points all along the same line, and because they deal with different areas (IE, god-belief and god-knowledge) it is entirely possible to be an "agnostic atheist", or an "agnostic theist".
So, when you say you've gone from "agnostic to atheist", what youy're really saying is that you've gone from "theist to atheist", from a god-believer to a non-believer.
No big deal, really, but it is always surprising to me how many people think that "agnostic" is some sort of fence-sitiing middle-ground. It's not.
In any case, congratulations on your new reality-based outlook on life. You'll find that many folks now will judge you exclusively by your lack of belief, and that your atheism will be discriminated against and equated with evil and immorality.
But you will have your self respect, and you won't have to lie to yourself anymore that some magic man in the sky made it all with magic. That's important.
Hang in there, and Happy New Year!
Brent,
Wow. Maybe I need to start from the beginning again. I think I made the switch from theist to agnostic (quick stopover) to atheist.
Also, I think the term "atheist" implies a rejection of the idea of god. Otherwise all newborn babies would be "atheists", right?
Anyway, thanks for the tips. And btw, wikipedia has an excellent entry on atheism.
LB
ps. From my experience agnostics are fence-sitiing middle-grounders. Not a criticism. I was one once.
Wow. Maybe I need to start from the beginning again. I think I made the switch from theist to agnostic (quick stopover) to atheist.
Also, I think the term "atheist" implies a rejection of the idea of god. Otherwise all newborn babies would be "atheists", right?
Anyway, thanks for the tips. And btw, wikipedia has an excellent entry on atheism.
LB
ps. From my experience agnostics are fence-sitiing middle-grounders. Not a criticism. I was one once.
OOOH OOOOH, I wanna be an atheist, too! Congratulations on coming out of the atheist closet you wanker!!
Just kidding, LB. As long as you're a good person, and I happen to know you are, faith is irrelevant outside of family holiday\rituals.
Good Luck with your conviction, since Brent is correct with the evil immorality bias. I personally enjoy confusing people, and myself, by telling people I am an optimistic individual spiritualist with a slant towards judeo-christion monotheism and buddhist fusion. or something.
Actually, I guess I am an agnostic theist, according to Brent.
you evil heathen - what would Ms. Voelker think of you?
Just kidding, LB. As long as you're a good person, and I happen to know you are, faith is irrelevant outside of family holiday\rituals.
Good Luck with your conviction, since Brent is correct with the evil immorality bias. I personally enjoy confusing people, and myself, by telling people I am an optimistic individual spiritualist with a slant towards judeo-christion monotheism and buddhist fusion. or something.
Actually, I guess I am an agnostic theist, according to Brent.
you evil heathen - what would Ms. Voelker think of you?
Glad to have you join the ranks of the enlightened! How did you get through all those years of Cath. scool as a believer?
My view is
Agnostic: I don't know. (My particular brand of agnosticism further states "and I don't care.")
Athiest: I have faith that something doesn't exist, despite the fact that there is no proof of its existence or lack of existince.
Makes Athiests just as bad as the goddies IMHO.
Agnostic: I don't know. (My particular brand of agnosticism further states "and I don't care.")
Athiest: I have faith that something doesn't exist, despite the fact that there is no proof of its existence or lack of existince.
Makes Athiests just as bad as the goddies IMHO.
To be fair, I think you're a bit off.
Agnosticism is the philosophical view that the truth values of certain claims—particularly theological claims regarding the existence of God, gods, or deities—are unknown, inherently unknowable, or incoherent, and therefore, (some agnostics may go as far to say) irrelevant to life.
Atheism is an absence of belief in the existence of god(s). This definition covers all nonetheists: both those who assert that there are no gods and those who make no claim about the existence of gods.
The key problem of the agnostics is that they think these things are "inherently unknowable", while the atheist says they're just "unknown", but are explainable by the scientific method some day. In addition, Occam's Razor would prevent us from ever assuming that the universe was created by a supernatural being so we know that not to be true. Agnostics fail to recognize this final point.
Post a Comment
Agnosticism is the philosophical view that the truth values of certain claims—particularly theological claims regarding the existence of God, gods, or deities—are unknown, inherently unknowable, or incoherent, and therefore, (some agnostics may go as far to say) irrelevant to life.
Atheism is an absence of belief in the existence of god(s). This definition covers all nonetheists: both those who assert that there are no gods and those who make no claim about the existence of gods.
The key problem of the agnostics is that they think these things are "inherently unknowable", while the atheist says they're just "unknown", but are explainable by the scientific method some day. In addition, Occam's Razor would prevent us from ever assuming that the universe was created by a supernatural being so we know that not to be true. Agnostics fail to recognize this final point.
<< Home
Web Counters