- Name: Lonnie Bruner
- Location: Washington, DC, United States
I live in DC, sail the Chesapeake Bay, have a lovely wife who's a web designer, a young son, an unruly hound dog, and am interested in most everything in the world. Oh yea, and I love the smell of burning trash in the Third World. That just gets me going.
- Wow, I've got a pretty decent home bar.
- Don't Even Try to Defeat Me in the 2008 Mustache C...
- Flotsam & Jetsam & the Pacific Trash Gyre
- Champagne for my real friends; real pain for my sh...
- Cities I Visited in 2007
- The First New York Times Article to Bring Tears to...
- Owning a sailboat is NOT expensive unless you want...
- This is me playing guitar in my college band circa...
- My Tour of the Maker's Mark Whiskey Distillery
- A Fireplace Makes Winter Worth Living
- July 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- November 2011
- July 2012
- October 2012
Blanketing opinions that I'll probably regret soon.
Monday, January 07, 2008
Chesapeake Bay vs. Strait of Hormuz
Turns out, being in the Strait of Hormuz is about like being in the Chesapeake Bay, if you switch the roles. Below is a map of the Strait of Hormuz referred to in the article. Notice any ship passing through has to be within about 30 miles of Iran:
Now look at the Chesapeake, keeping in mind how far 30 miles is (legend, bottom left):
Now imagine the CNN article if I replace the word "Iran" with "America" and reverse the locations:
(CNN) -- Three U.S. Navy ships "harassed and provoked" five Iranian Revolutionary Guard boats early Sunday in the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay, the Iranian military said Monday, calling the encounter a "significant" confrontation.Now we get a better perspective of the real situation and the naked face of US propaganda.
Hormuz is an international waterway with other countries bordering it, and while the PURPOSE of our military ships being there is up for argument, their RIGHT to be there isn't.
The Chesapeake is a bay surrounded by one country and is within that country's border. Military vessels there without that country's permission is practically a declaration of war. As are wide-eyed drunken yachtsmen approaching stationary naval warships.
Having said that I still feel stupid even partially defending our media/propaganda machine.
The Atlantic is also an international waterway. Therefore, near the mouth of the Chesapeake is an international waterway.
Take a closer look at that map of Hormuz. Regardless of what we think of the Iranian regime, you can see why these near-conflicts occur when you reverse the roles and put it all in your own backyard.
The Iranians react like any other government would to military ships from a far-away, hostile nation.
(Let me be clear: I'm not making moral equivalencies between the US and Iran).
Think about the Gulf of Tonkin Incident. That was also framed as an act of "agression" against the US. The two are similar historical analogies.
You have to ask yourself this question: how can an "act of aggresion" occur when a small country's military dares to step up to the largest military in history in their own backyard?
I can't imagine the emotional impact of hostile US ships on the horizon, but it all boils down to this. If that occurred in international waters, they are wrong. If it occured in Iranian waters, we are wrong.
US govt would love an act of aggression against US military by Iran, and you are right in thinking that the US ships being there are acts of aggression in themselves. But until someone gets killed it's all just kids on the playground trying to get eachother to flinch.
Our military (and the citizens that fund it) should come to expect more than a few USS Stark, USS Cole, and HMS Cornwall types of situations if they continue to cruise near the bad guys.
Yes, the Cole and Stark are acts of aggression.
I guess my whole point with this post is to try and more fully understand the situation and the tensions that exist over there.
1 - The US has the largest military in history.
2 - The US has a record in the post-war era of attacking countries against international law or opinion. (The list is too long to write here).
2 - The US is the world's sole superpower.
3 - Hormuz is thousands of miles from the US and right at the doorstep of the US's official enemy.
4 - Having said all this, it's very odd that we would say that the Iranians "harassed and provoked" the US 30 miles from their border.
Now imagine if Iran was the world's sole superpower and had warships cruising within 30 miles of the US eastern seaboard. That's the best way to understand what is happening over there.
I'd also add two more things:
1 - The US is armed with nuclear weapons which can reach anywhere on the globe in about 30 minutes. Iran does not have this.
2 - The US backed an invasion of Iran in the 1980s which resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iranians over almost a full decade.
I asked a room full of coworkers about the incident and only about 3 of them knew about it (Not really their fault considering the lack of media coverage). and the ones that did hear about it couldn't understand why the Iranian Navy would do that.
When I explained to them where and what happened, I just got blank stares as if a short circuit occured. And these are educated people of mixed political persuasion, all tired of and mostly opposed to the war in Iraq! (I asked them).
The media/propaganda machine works. spooky.
But thank God since my retirement portfolio would tank without govt military spending.
As Admiral Farragut was quoted, "DAMN THE TORPEDOES (or small boxes dumped overboard by little Iranian gunboats)FULL SPEED AHEAD!"
What would you call a group of Americans who infiltrated Iran and blew up some buildings in Teheran?