- Name: Lonnie Bruner
- Location: Washington, DC, United States
I live in DC, sail the Chesapeake Bay, have a lovely wife who's a web designer, a young son, an unruly hound dog, and am interested in most everything in the world. Oh yea, and I love the smell of burning trash in the Third World. That just gets me going.
- Enough with the anti-China nonsense.
- This is what I think of (pre-bottled) Bacardi Moji...
- Thoughts On Lakes vs. the Sea
- The Hoity Toity Aspect of Fly Fishing
- Guest Post: The 1970 Red Chevy Nova
- In Northern Michigan Until August 4th
- I suppose I'm tough enough to raise orchids as a h...
- Good luck in the Pacific Cup, Edward
- I like R. Kelly: I'm either a huge doosh, a young ...
- We probably are a "nation a whiners"
- July 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- November 2011
- July 2012
- October 2012
Blanketing opinions that I'll probably regret soon.
Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Just Some Economic Statistics
Countries whose latest unemployment rate is WORSE (higher) than ours:
China, Canada, Euro area, Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, Hungary, Poland, Russia, Sweden, Turkey, India, Indonesia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Venezuela, Egypt, Israel, South Africa
Countries whose latest GDP growth is WORSE (lower) than ours:
Japan, Britain, Canada, Italy, Denmark, Hungary, Norway, Sweden
Countries whose latest inflation data is WORSE (higher) than ours:
China, Belgium, Czech Republic, Hungary, Russia, Turkey, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Venezuela, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, South Africa
Full stats below:
I see what you mean, and that's partly true, but trust me, the raw numbers ARE important and the comparison to (many) other countries sheds light on what it's like for humans around the world. We aren't even close to the level of economic problems as in the USA in the early 1980s where there was double digit unemployment, inflation and interest rates.
My point is that there's a sort of 100th Monkey effect going on about the economy: once the figurative 100th monkey says that the sky is falling, nearly everyone starts saying it -- and it's mosly whining. But the fact is, the Fed used to HOPE that unemployment got as low as 6% and right now it's only 5.7%! Nothin!
Also, check out this LA Times article on gas prices which says that "Gasoline is more affordable for American families now than it was in the days of the gas-guzzling muscle cars of the early 1960s."
My point: if you listen to the hype and whining, people might think it's bad out there ... until, that is, you actually look at the numbers.
The Economist list does not include Zimbabwe. It's only 42 of the strongest economies in the world.
big time players are getting pounded on wall street.
i do believe in trickle down economics. trust me if the richie riches are starting to feel it, they are going to make the middle class PAY. one layoff in your family, and you'll be singing a not so jolly tune about our economy.
it's bad karma to get cocky about our economy...
I report the present, my friends. That's all I'm doing.
Yes, my hat is made of pure tinfoil! But no, I'm not alone:
Right, "pure lies." as opposed to those highly reliable stats put out by the tinfoil hat brigade.
I didn't say "pure lies," I said "lies." I said my hat was made of "pure tinfoil," which is 100% true!
Sounds like Newsweek is part of the tinfoil hat brigade! Governments have every reason to lie about their economic statistics, which is why they do it so often.
From your article:
"The traditional 'headline' inflation rate, measuring the rise or fall of an average of all prices for a broad basket of goods and services, was nudged aside in favor of an index that stripped out the supposedly more volatile categories of food (subject to price spikes due to weather or plague) and energy (subject to price spikes due to unfriendly foreigners)."
Stripping out products from the basket that are subject to short-term, volatile prices chances shouldn't be described as a "lie", should it? I mean, inflation is supposed to measure broad, long-term price increases --- general increases --- not the whims of something like steak or gasoline.
I think you are partially correct that the government's inflation stats don't perfectly reflect what affects consumers but it's not conspiratorial by your charge of a "lie".
The way I think govts produce all kinds of false information is that the people at the very top of the power structure know very well that they're lying, and the people below them are tasked with coming up with the results they know the people at the top want to hear.
So I don't believe that all the govt economists responsible for monitoring CPI and other less-than-reliable stats think or believe they're doing anything but coming up with the best statistics they can; they don't lie and they don't have to. They just produce the results their lying bosses want 'em to!
--Random Foil-Wrapped Libertarian
Hope you're having fun in Houston. Bush country!
Since inflation is defined as "a rise in the general level of prices of goods and services over time" (italics mine) that can be a difficult thing to measure. Obviously, even a government does not have the ability to average the price of every good and service in circulation so they take a basket of general goods that best reflects price changes "over time" --- not short term ups and down (ie, oil) --- and average that. You have a problem with the choices put into that basket.
This is different from something being "false", or a "lie", isn't it?
As for the way the power structure in government works, you seem to have some more special knowledge of this than I do!
They say inflation is difficult to measure, maybe so, but they introduce all these "hedonic adjustments" not to give us a clearer picture of inflation but to give themselves more tools to fudge with the numbers. Is fudging numbers a "lie" if it's done repeatedly in your favor? Maybe not a lie, but not stats I would trust.
You know I am going to argue with that definition of inflation! You're just baiting me to increase your comments you sick bastard. but for the record I think it should be emphasized that inflation is both a general rise in prices but also an increase in the money supply, and you know which of those two I think causes the other! (and who's to blame!)
(Answers for anyone else reading: the increase in money supply causes price inflation, and the Federal Reserve is responsible for it).
If the U.S government didn't lie/fudge on the CPI numbers, we'd have had our credit cut off a long time ago. It's only by stealing from its own citizens that the state survives and thrives, and lowballing CPI and inflation is one of the scuzziest ways it does so: taking money from young people when they're working and promising them a secure income later, then slashing that income thru phony numbers when they're old. Pure parasitism.